Home

About Us

Current Issue

July Issue

A tome on MKT Bhagavatar, T.K. GOVINDA RAO, Sangeeta sthalam-s, The GNB bani – Part III, THE SHEHNAI, Mallari: endangered species, Merrily misinterpreted, G.V. RAMANI, Srihari Nayak: Chhau exponent and guru, Tiruppamburam S. Shanmugasundaram, Vainika and many more
... Subscribe Today

copyrightsruti.com

Designed, Developed & Maintained By
Swathi Soft Solutions

   
  

Section Synopsis (March 2006)

NEWS & NOTES

SEMINAR ON SILAPPADIKARAM IN DELHI (Part II)
MUSIC AND DANCE AS EMBODIED IN THE TEXT
-LEELA VENKATARAMAN

Dr. Prameela Gurumurthi-- Head of the Department of Music, Madras University-- began by singing the Mangala Vaazhtu in Silappadikaram, Tingalai porrudum, invoking the sun, the moon and the rain. Lauding the thoroughness of Ilango Adigal, she referred to the 'kural ili' method or modal shift of tonic, so clearly referred to in the music descriptions of the epic. In 'Arangetru Kaadai' where Madhavi's training and debut recital are described in detail, one can see that the poet is given prime importance. We have the later vaggeyakara-s who combined both composition and music for the lyric. But in the Silappadikaram times, the two functions of poet and music composer were obviously independent as shown in the Paripaadal where eyal and isai are separate. At the age of twelve, after seven years of training, Madhavi gave her first performance. At the same age, Kannagi was married-- the two women shown in entirely different situations. The word 'Paani' for tala is interesting, said the speaker, for the Sanskrit word 'Panigrahanam' has reference to what is done with the hands, which keep tala. The poet was expected to know the four languages Vadachol (Sanskrit), Isaichol (desi or regional) Eyalchol (literature), and Tirichol (colloquial). Music was rendered in four speeds-- Mudanadai, Vaaram, Kurai and Tiral. Mentioned in the text is "Vaaram paadiya toriya makkalir," senior members of the dancing profession, perhaps now no longer able to dance, who formed part of the music team for the dance, singing in medium tempo. What was required was 'asaiyaa marabu' or faultless technique in that which does not change. There were songs for the vettiyal (royalty) and poduviyal (for the lay). The poet was specifically required to avoid abusive language. The percussionist Tannumai had to know all 'koothu' (dance), 'pann' and the seven types of 'tooku' as well as 'alavu' and 'koodai' (tempi). The flute player who decided on the pitch of the music, had to know how to mix the chittiram and vanjani-- the 'vallina sorkkal' (stronger sounds) and the 'mellina sorkkal' (soft)-- which means that the sahitya with words had to be fully understood for its nuances, even by the instrumentalist. He had to be sensitive to the sa-pa relationship and the eleven qualities of pann-s....

Speaking of the Yazh, the stringed instrument about which details are given in the text, Prameela Gurumurthi talked of the four types of Yazh, namely, Peri Yazh, Makhara Yazh, Saguda Yazh and Sengotai Yazh, each with a different number of strings. What Ilango was referring to in Silappadikaram was the Saguda Yazh with 14 strings....
My paper on Dance began with a mention of how the exuberance of Silappadikaram contrasted with the stark nature of Manimekhalai said to have been written at the same time. The epic clearly showed that there existed two streams of dance, one secular entertainment much like what we call classical style known as 'Santi Koothu' with a full fledged grammar, and the other, of ritual dances-- Vinoda Koothu, rendered by lay people while worshipping their pastoral deities. Nataka Ganikai-s or courtesans like Madhavi were diligently trained to dance for many years and were very handsomely rewarded by the aristocracy for their expertise. While the dance was secular in character and meant for entertainment, the themes from the myths were devotional. Known as 'Aadal' or 'Koothu', dance was classified under two heads of Ahakoothu and Purakoothu, the same classification used for poetry. Ahakoothu was further classified under six broad pairs of concepts- Vasai (satire) and Pugazh (in praise), Vettiyal (performed for royalty) and Poduviyal (for the lay), Vari and Vari Santi, Santi (classical) and Vinodam (folk), Aryam and Tamil (which shows the Sanskritic influences having come in already), Iyalpu and Desi....

What is amazing about dance is that it is not looked upon in isolation, but in its integrated perspective with other disciplines like poetry, music, etc. The dancer is required to be fully conversant with the fourteen constituents (vilak-kurppu) of the dance....

Scrupulously prescribed are the measurements of the stage....

The evening of the seminar saw a refined Bharatanatyam recital by Priyadarshini Govind. The research by S. Raghuraman of Chennai and the music inputs by Prameela Gurumurthi provided Priya with the base for choreography....

....A fair share of the praise for the recital belonged to Preeti Mahesh for her singing, which apart
from its tunefulness and classical verities, had bhava, chiming in with the dancer's rendition, without ploughing a lonely furrow by trying to attract attention to itself. Priyadarshini can build on this fine base she has created.

Click to read more

OPINION COLUMN

Carnatic And Hindustani Music -LUDWIG PESCH (Amsterdam )


In the Sruti Box section in Sruti 253, Trichur K. Sundaram (C & H Music) has offered some interesting insights into the appreciation of Carnatic music beyond its natural habitat, as it were. Being committed to the appreciation and dissemination of Carnatic music abroad, and also because I have been cited in two items-- the above one and in "Tambura - 1" by `Garland' N. Rajagopalan in the same edition, I would like to share my own views for further debate:

Complexity does not make one music system superior to another. Complexity is also the hallmark of 20th and 21st century music that is variously categorised as "contemporary", "new", "avant-garde", etc. (This music, irrespective of its other merits, is hardly listened to by
self-professed music lovers even in the West and typically broadcast in the middle of the night for the benefit of a few aficionados.) Does this mean that "classical music" of various shades is lacking complexity? By no means, but composers of the past pursued different goals than their modern counterparts.

The complications that may arise in the appreciation of Carnatic music can be viewed as an intellectual challenge and even flaunted as its hallmark; or (more commonly), deplored as constituting its chief burden, and it is indeed a cause for some deep-rooted misunderstandings and prejudices outside India.

I have to confess that I never miss a Hindustani concert when offered a chance and enjoy every part of it. The prevailing focus on a few time-honoured procedures in Hindustani music (for example, beginning slowly and ending in fast passages or the absence of an extensive drum solo) seems to be no weakness either, far from it. Conversely, I have listened to much Carnatic music that is mindboggling in terms of various "complications" (for example, virtuosity, vocal range, teamwork, calculations, spontaneity) but failed to touch me beyond the thrill of the moment.

Incomprehensible strains of unconventional sound combinations are surely not the answer
to lack of interest. What matters is serious artistic work that takes the whole gamut of human emotions into account, whether or not this is likely to attract large audiences in the immediate future. Fortunately, there are musicians and teachers of that calibre, and many of them have a broad outlook. It is the most honourable task on the part of rasika-s, patrons, teachers, educational institutions and organisers to find talented musicians and enjoy their presentations after enabling them to develop their talents as long as it takes. (It took Alauddin Khan nearly half a century, and generations of musi-cians and listeners have benefitted from his quest for self-perfection.)

As with cooking, connoisseurs of the arts tend to have little interest in the procedures that precede or accompany the acquisition and preparation of various ingredients. Furthermore, the aesthetic delight derived from good music is as immediate as it is lasting beyond the tangible experience which, I understand, raises a true rasika's delight above that of a gourmet (though the latter may also be a great rasika and vice versa).

For the same reason, I believe that the debate around the "vanishing" tambura is so important for the future of Carnatic music in and outside India: A good, beautiful tambura is more than just a nostalgic feature for senior listeners; a well-tuned and played tambura, provided it is carefully positioned and audible during a live concert, lends another aesthetic dimension to music. All this cannot be explained just in terms of auditory experience, overtones or musical colours. Its contribution is more than the sum of all these and other properties, some of which have been admirably incorporated in the electronic devices available now. Yet, first and foremost, the presence of a tambura makes a powerful statement about the way musicians and organisers pay attention to detail beyond that which is duly expected of them.

An experienced tambura player is an artist in his or her own right and deserves proper acknowledgement and remuneration for the valuable services rendered. Yet a tambura player's name can rarely be ascertained, be it in recording and programme notes or photo credits.

Proper training in the art of playing and maintaining a tambura has not even been considered by most modern institutions as part of their curriculum. It definitely should be considered, and I hope it soon will. Why? Firstly, because there is an intrinsic quality of raga music informed by the perfect (admittedly complex) sounds of a tambura; and secondly, because Carnatic music will never qualify for prime treatment in the eyes and ears of discerning music lovers beyond South India (or South Indian communities abroad) until attention is paid to details such as those outlined above. Whether this will change in the foreseeable future is entirely in the hands of those who train, promote and present Carnatic music in India and beyond.

The cooperation of the main artists is indispensable and a matter of self-interest as and when they wake up to the fact that it is attention to every minute detail in a concert that determines their future prospects beyond the current touring and festival frenzy. With the advent of another generation, the current level of interest in Carnatic music may just fade out as fast as it has grown into a profitable industry since the 1990s. After all, each generation is bound to develop its own musical orientation whereas artistic integrity and beauty are bound to prevail.

Click to read more

MAIN FEATURE

RAJAM PUSHPAVANAM
(1916-1991)

A Victim Of Orthodoxy
- INDIRA MENON

The following article is written by INDIRA MENON, freelance writer and author of books titled The Madras Quartet - Women in Carnatic Music, and Great Masters of Carnatic Music 1930-1965.

I discovered her from the Song Books of the old gramophone companies which I found in my grandfather the late Sir K. Ramunni Menon's library. The Columbia Company was announcing the release of its latest disc:

"A Rare Treat for Music Lovers - Srimathi Rajam Pushpavanam. Those who understand carnatic music know the value of Rajam Pushpavanam's records. Not only has she a superb voice `with beauty of tone and delicacy of expression' and style but in addition a great charm which comes through well on her record. No artiste is so capable of doing full justice to the great song Kanakkankodi of Sri Papanasam Sivan than Srimathi Rajam".

There is a picture of a lovely young woman, with curly hair looking sideways. (See alongside). She exudes an air of confidence and self assurance.

I searched for her records among my grandfather's collection [now with the SAMUDRI Archives]. There were four discs but, alas, Kanakkankodi (Kambhoji) was not one of them. I listened to Manasa sancharare (Sama) and was enthralled by her voice. It had all the qualities mentioned in the blurb.
 
Rajam was the daughter of Madurai Pushpavanam Iyer, uncle of Madurai Mani Iyer. Pushpavanam was the rage among rasika-s and has become one of the legends of Carnatic music. When I was writing the book Great Masters of Carnatic Music, vidwan T.V. Sankaranarayanan, his grand-nephew, spoke to me about Pushpavanam and Rajam....

Pushpavanam died in his prime in 1917 at the age of 32, leaving his 16-year old wife Sundarambal and one-year old daughter Rajam. From her childhood Rajam began to hear the fantastic stories about her illustrious father.... Following the family tradition, her musical training started at a very young age. Her guru-s were Mudicondan Sabhapathy Iyer, Parur Sundaram Iyer and her cousin, Madurai Mani Iyer. She later learnt padam-s and javali-s from Sesha Iyengar....

Rajam inherited her father's vocal prowess. There was an inexplicable quality to her voice, with its amazing range and timbre....

The only evidence of Rajam's musicianship is to be found in the old gramophone "plates" of the 1930s and early 40s.... But an unusual feature of Rajam's voice that proves she was much ahead of her times was the use of modulation....

Opportunities to sing at marriage functions and concerts came in plenty for Rajam.... She entered a competition held by the Music Academy in the 1930s and won the first prize....

By the age of twenty four, Rajam had become a woman of immense wealth, "dressed from head to foot in gold and diamonds". She built a palatial bungalow at 22 Ramachandra Road, Mylapore and owned three motor cars (Ford A40, Studebaker and Morris Minor) which she drove herself, a very unconventional thing for a Brahmin lady.... There was a brief foray into the world of cinema too. Again very unconventional for someone with her background. She acted in two films....

With such a good start to her music career, what happened to this brilliant and vivacious daughter of Pushpavanam?

....Rajam Pushpavanam's truncated career illustrates that she was a victim of orthodoxy. Her marriage virtually put an end to the career she had built up from her childhood. And when she tried to pick up the threads after the nine-year gap, widowhood brought its own train of woes. As a typical case of out-of-sight out-of-mind, the sabha organisers may have been reluctant to field an unknown entity.... If, at this stage, some male member of the family had undertaken to act as her manager, she might have made the effort to make a comeback....

Insensitive social taboos ultimately rebound on society and we are the poorer for it.

Click to read more

SPOT LIGHT

Sangeeta Sthalam-s - 13
Heritage Landmarks in Music

Tanjavur Naalu Kaal Mandapam-
SRIRAM.V

It has now become customary to lament the dearth of Carnatic music in Tanjavur, once the very heartland of the art form. But far from the sabha-s and the sabha culture of Chennai, a music festival that is 106 years old still continues to be held year after year, albeit with some gaps in its history.

The Prasanna Venkateswara Swami shrine of Tanjavur is very well known.... The area in front of the temple is a small town square, a rare piece of open space in old Tanjavur. This has a four pillared hall that faces the temple. On the right hand side of this 'naalu kaal mandapam', as one faces the temple, is a 'ter mutti' or the elevated platform from which the utsava moorti (processional idol) of the temple is placed in the chariot during the annual car festival. The space below the pavilion houses a shrine to Lord Hanuman, who in local parlance is referred to as Sangeeta Anjaneya Swami....

In 1899, the famed mridangist Narayanaswami Appa began the practice of holding an Anjaneya Festival in the space in front of the Naalu Kaal Mandapam. This spanned five days and comprised Harikatha performances only. Clearly Tanjavur Krishna Bhagavatar was the star of the show and till his death in 1903 it was his performance that would mark the inauguration each year. The festival was discontinued following Narayanaswami Appa's death a few years later.

In 1929, Malaikottai Govindaswamy Pillai, the renowned violinist, resolved to revive the festival. He was assi-sted in this effort by the mridanga vidwan Ramdoss Rao and also by two rasika-s and bhakta-s, "Signal" Mani Iyer and Vasudeva Sastry....

The festival was revived on 6th July 1929.

....In 1931, Pillai passed away. Vasu Sastry took on the responsibility of conducting the festival, earning the name "Hanuman Vasu". In later years, due to advancing age, he entrusted the responsibility to mridanga vidwans T.K. Murthy and Tanjore Upendran (the latter has since passed away), and to musicologist B.M. Sundaram. Over the years, others joined the committee.

Many are the interesting stories connected with the festival....

Today, the festival continues to be held for ten days every year. Most of the artists charge only travel fare and any extra amount received is donated to the temple. The programmes are funded by public donations and there are no sponsors sought. Many local artists such as nagaswara vidwan Kothandapani and tavil exponent T.R. Govindarajan donate liberally to the festival........... N. Sivaramakrishnan, 27/12, Rajaji Road, Srinivasapuram, Tanjavur 613009 is in charge of collection of donations for the festival.

Heritage Watch

Now that this series has gone on for thirteen issues, I thought it is perhaps appropriate to update Sruti readers on what is happening to the sthalam-s that we covered earlier. There is as usual, some bad news and some good news as well.....
 

Click to read more

BRIEF NOTES

30th Anniversary Of Raghavan Centre -A.S.S.

The 30th anniversary of Dr. V. Raghavan Centre was celebrated on the 29th of October 2005 in Chennai. Bharatanatyam exponent, teacher and critic, Nandini Ramani is the Managing Trustee of the Centre. Kunnakudi Vaidyanathan (Member-Secretary, Tamil Nadu Eyal Isai Nataka Mandram) presided over the function, guru-s K.J. Sarasa and Savitri Jagannatha Rao offered felicitations. R. Kalidas, senior member of the Centre honoured the guests. The violin maestro made a plea to all dancers not to forget their mother-tongue while making announcements.

Nandini Ramani presented cash awards and mementos to her long-time associates involved in the Bharatanatyam wing of the Centre which propagates the T. Balasaraswati style, and also her teachers, Carnatic vocalist Prof. B. Krishnamurti and T. Mukta-- specialist in padam-s and javali-s, who have imparted training to her over the decades. K. Ramiah, nattuvangam artist and Kanchipuram G. Ekambaram, senior percussionist, both hailing from the same dance tradition were honoured on the occasion. T. Mukta's daughter Lakshmi received the memento and cash award of 10,000 rupees on her behalf. Dr. C.S. Sundaram, Sanskrit scholar and close associate of the Centre, vainika R. Ramani, vocalist Sarayu Srinivasan, flutist P.V. Ramana, and vocalist Balaji (of T. Mukta's family) were also honoured.

As part of the function, an entire Bharatanatyam margam was presented by senior students of Nandini Ramani. It provided interesting insights into the handling of adavu-s in the Bala style. Nandini also presented a padam-- Alasara paritapamu. Senior students of Nandini felicitated her on the completion of 50 years in the field of Bharatanatyam

SSP In Kannada -KUSUMA RAO

For the first time after its publication a century ago, the Sangeeta Sampradaya Pradarsini by Subbarama Dikshitar has been translated into Kannada by the well-known scholar and musicologist Prof. S.K. Ramachandra Rao and vidwan Anandarama Udupa. The Pradarsini, was written originally in Telugu. Now ANANYA has come forward to undertake the uphill task of making the Kannada version of this invaluable treatise on Carnatic music available for seekers of traditional music.

On Sunday, the 17th December at the Gayana Samaja in Bangalore, three books were released by vidwan R.K. Srikantan, namely, Prathamaabhyaasa Pustakavu, Sangeeta Sampradaya Pradarsini - Samputa 1, and Maha Vaidyanatha Sivan avara Mela Raga Malike edited by Prof. SKR and Vidwan Udupa. Distinguished personalities like Thimmappa, Vice-Chancellor of Bangalore University, S. Krishnamurthy (author of Sangeetha Samaya, grandson of Mysore Vasudevacharya, and former AIR Station Director) and Dr. Shachi Devi (musicologist and co-author of Karnataka Sangeeta Darpana, one of the two Tirumalai Sisters) were on stage.

Six disciples of R.A. Ramamani sang, aptly, Sreenaathaadi Guruguho jayati, in raga Mayamalavagawla, the first song Dikshitar composed, for invocation. Dr. T.S. Satyavathi welcomed the guests and spoke a few words about them in her interesting way. Shachi Devi, defining 'sampradaya', said, "sam" means good, "pradaya" is giving. So 'Sampradaya' means passing on what is good to others. She spoke of dhatu-matu samanvaya in Dikshitar's kriti-s.

Prof. Thimmappa praised the dedication of ANANYA in executing a big task like this, which even universities find it hard to do. He announced that Prof. SKR has been given an honorary doctorate by the Bangalore University.

R.K. Srikantan mentioned that books like Pallavi Swarakalpavalli by Tiruvottriyur Tyagayyar ought to be translated into Kannada too. Udupa said he felt honoured to do this work with a person like Prof. SKR and for an organisation like ANANYA.

After the books were released, R.N. Srilatha accompanied by Veena Suresh (violin), Tumkur B. Ravishankar (mridanga) and Tumkur B. Shashishankar (ghata), gave a scholarly vocal recital, comprising of the choicest Dikshitar kriti-s, like Mamava Meenakshi in raga Varali and Sree Kamalaambikey in Sree raga.

The three books were available for those interested for 100 rupees less than their face value that evening.

Remembering Guru Krishnaveni -SULOCHANA SARALAYA

The 15th of July happened to be a special day for many old students of Kalakshetra as well as connoisseurs of dance, as they had the opportunity of witnessing a slide show on the late Krishnaveni Lakshmanan, former Principal of Kalakshetra, Chennai. Tara Priyadarshini, U.S.A.-based disciple of Krishnaveni, chose to pay her respects and express her gratitude to her beloved "Akka" (with whom she had lived and learnt for eleven years) through a programme titled `Guru Smarane' at the Nayana Auditorium in Bangalore.

S. Rajaram, former Director of Kalakshetra, presided over the function. He disclosed that Krishnaveni had donned the lead role in a majority of the 26 dance-dramas choreographed by Rukmini Devi and that nobody could surpass her in the 'Agni Pravesa' scene in the Ramayana series. He paid glowing tributes to Krishnaveni (whom he knew from 1953) who was an excellent choreographer, a good performer-cum-musician, and a very generous teacher.

G. Sundari, a close associate of Krishnaveni, recalled how Krishnaveni literally entered Kalakshetra through a window, as she used to watch rehearsals standing outside (as a five-year old child) and came in at the behest of Rukmini Devi. Sundari paid tributes to the qualities of compassion and humility which Krishnaveni possessed in abundance. She also spoke about her commitment to art, her ability to understand and express the essence of the lyrics as she was a linguist and her talent as an excellent musician-cum-composer of sollukattu-s, swara passages and jati-s. She also disclosed that Krishnaveni was a great lover of animals.

Bharatanatyam dancer and guru, Uma Rao of Mysore, who spent twenty years in Kalakshetra, described Krishnaveni as a graceful and versatile dancer with lovely eyes (neerajakshi) who was able to live the characters she portrayed. She also dwelt on her original way of using the hasta-s and her ability not only to spot young talent, but also to provide them opportunities to participate in Kalakshetra productions. Paying tribute to her sense of commitment, she disclosed that on her numerous trips abroad, she would not go out sight-seeing like the other members of the troupe but would stay back, rest and be fresh for the performance.

Krishnaveni's daughter Gayathri Balagurunathan and Tara Priyadarshini paid homage to their guru, through a Bharatanatyam performance presenting items choreographed by Krishnaveni. Commencing with Ganapati Kavuthuvam, Tara presented Siva Stuti which was tuned and choreographed by her guru as a ragamalika and talamalika while Gayathri presented Perialwar's pasuram (in which he imagines himself to be Yasoda), tuned as a ragamalika. Incidentally, this was the last item to be choreographed by Krishnaveni and was presented for the first time on stage by her daughter. The tillana in the raga Hindolam, performed by both, provided a fitting finale to the 'Guru Smarane' programme. Uma Rao did the nattuvangam while artists from Kalakshetra, Sai Shankar (vocal), Anil Kumar (mridanga) and Shashidharan (flute) provided good musical support to the dancers.

Mela Raga Vyjayanti  -SULOCHANA SARALAYA


'Neelambari', an association consisting of disciples of Neela Ramgopal, celebrated her 70th birthday in an unique way at the Indian Institute of World Culture auditorium in Bangalore on the 5th June. The disciples produced Mela Raga Vyjayanti, a set of 18 CDs, consisting of kriti-s in all the 72 mela raga-s, rendered by their guru Neela Ramgopal, and arranged for its release on the day of the felicitation. Musicologist V.V. Srivatsa, after releasing the set of CDs, called it a historic event, as it would serve as reference material for both music teachers and students in the years to come. The purpose of this project, is to share Neela Ramgopal's knowledge with all the students of music, who rarely get exposure to the lesser known mela raga-s. The unique feature of this project is that compositions of different composers in different languages have been selected. Each composition has been rendered with raga alapana and swaraprastara, which enables the listener to understand the raga bhava. Each CD has four raga-s with the names of the raga-s, and their arohana and avarohana.

Vimala Rangachar, speaking on the occasion, said that 'vidya daana' was the greatest of daana-s and the large number of students under the 'Neela Ambara', was proof of Neela Ramgopal's generous nature as well as the disciples love for their guru.

Revathy, representing the disciples, praised the ability of her guru, in not only recognising the talent of her young students but also finding a platform for most of them. Usha Kesari, called her guru, a philosopher, friend and guide to her innumerable students.

The felicitation function was followed by a short vocal concert by Neela Ramgopal, who commenced with a rare composition of Tyagaraja, in the raga Jhankaradhwani. B. Raghuram, Cheluvaraju and M.A. Krishnamurthy, rendered support on the violin, mridanga and ghata respectively.

Awarded

Doctorates by the Department of Indian Music, University of Madras, to Priyashri V. Rao for her thesis on "Dance Performance and its Components - A Historical Study"; to K. Madhu Mohan for his thesis on "Pitch Analysis in Carnatic Music - An Examination of Intonation & Modern Theories of 22 Sruti-s", in November 2005

SNA Awards 2005

Music

C.R. Bhat, Ramashrey Jha (H-vocal), Brijbhushan Kabra (H-guitar), Tulsidas Borkar (H-harmonium), S.V. Parthasarathy, P.S. Narayanaswamy (C-vocal), Ongolo Rangayya (C-nagaswara), V.V. Subramanyam (C-violin).

Dance

Rhadha (Bharatanatyam), Tirath Ram Azad (Kathak), Mathur Govindan Kutty (Kathakali), K. Radhamohon Sharma (Manipuri), Korada Narasimha Rao (Koochipoodi), Durga Charan Ranbir (Odissi), T.H. Chaotombi Singh (Creative & experimental dance), Josyula Krishnamurthi (Music for dance - Koochipoodi Bhagavata maddala).

Traditional / Folk / Tribal Dance / Music / Theatre and Puppetry

P.K.G. Nambiar (Koodiyattam), Subbu Arumugam (Villupattu), Kashi Nath Pujapanda (Odissi music), Babu Bhai Ranpura (Folk music - Gujarat), Khirod Khaklari (Bodo dance & music), Daryao Singh Mallik (Folk theatre - Haryana), D.S. Aiyyelu (dance costume), Ganpat Sakaram Masge (puppetry).

Overall Contribution / Scholarship in Performing Arts

Pratibha Agarwal

AWARDED

Gold medals in two categories to the Indian team: to Bharatanatyam dancers Snigdha & Sneha Venkatramani in the Traditional Dance category; and to sarangi and tabla players Mohammad Ayyub & Kishore Gangani in the Traditional Music category; at the 2nd Delphic Games (Cultural Olympics) held at Kuching, Sarawak in Malaysia in September 2005.

CELEBRATE

Second anniversary of Sougandhika Centre for Mohini Attam run by dancer Dr. Neena Prasad; 13 November 2005 in Chennai.

Seventh anniversary of Kala Pradarshini run by dancer Parvathi Ravi Ghantasala; recently in Chennai.

FORMAL DEBUT

Jaan Freeman & Shanti Pillai (Bharatanatyam), disciples of Nandini Ramani (Dr. V. Raghavan Centre for Performing Arts, Chennai) and Priyamvada Sankar (Priyamvada Sankar School of Bharatanatyam, Montreal); 5 November 2005 in New York.

Shruti & Smriti (Bharatanatyam), daughters of Mr. G.K. Bhat & Mrs. Vasumathi; and disciples of P. Praveen Kumar (Chithkala School of Dance); 6 October 2005 in Bangalore.

Megha, d/o Mr. Krishna Rudrapatna & Mrs. Savithri; and Mathangi d/o Mr.
R.C. Keshavan & Gayathri Keshavan; both Bharatanatyam disciples of Gayathri Keshavan (Academy of Bharatanatyam); 9 October in Bangalore.

Harini (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. E.R. Lakshmanan & Mrs. Mangalsundari Lakshmanan; and disciple of Jayanthi Subramaniam); 14 October in Chennai.

V. Dharvika (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. S. Ganesh & Mrs. Vidya Ganesh; and disciple of Sailaja (Saila Sudha); 16 October 2005 in Chennai.

Hamsini (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. M. Balasubramanian & Dr. Sudha Balasubramanian; and disciple of Jayanthi Subramaniam (Kala Darsana); 16 October 2005 in Chennai.

M. Nithya Kalyani (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. Mohan & Mrs. Mythily Mohan; and disciple of Ambika Kameshwar (RASA - The Arts Centre); 16 October in Chennai.

Pranitha (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. Pravin R. Kamat & Mrs. Sheela Kamat; and disciple of Vandya Srinath (Bhramara School of Dance); 16 October in Bangalore.

Rashmi (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. R. Rajashekar & Mrs. R. Nagarathna; and disciple of Lalitha Srinivasan (Nupura), 22 October in Bangalore.

Sandhya (Bharatanatyam), d/o Mr. S. Sathiamoorthy & Mrs. Sujatha Sathiamoorthy; and disciple of Jayanthi Subramaniam (Kala Darsana); 24 October in Chennai.

R. Kokulavarthany (Bharatanatyam), disciple of Ranganayaki Jayaraman (Sri Saraswathi Gana Nilayam); 27 October 2005 in Chennai.

R. Prahelika (Bharatanatyam), daughter of Mr. S.K. Rajagopalan & Mrs. Meera Rajagopalan; and student of Tapasya Kala Sampradaya; 28 October 2005 in Chennai.

Preethi (Bharatanatyam), d/o Dr. A.B. Selvaraja & Mrs. Kalpana Selvaraja; and disciple of Parvathi Ravi Ghantasala (Kala Pradarshini); 30 October in Chennai.

DIED

Sharbari Mukherjee
(57), Hindustani musician; music and dance critic for Link and Patriot; resource person for various projects of NCERT, AIR, Doordarshan and SNA; served as Deputy Secretary, and Secretary, Sangeet Natak Akademi, New Delhi; was actively involved in important arts events like the Lok Utsav, Brhaddesi Sangeet Mahotsav, Swarna Jayanti Sangeet Utsav, and other training and documentation schemes of SNA; 15 November 2005 after a long illness.

Vimala Sarma (67), Sruti Correspondent in Mumbai; psychologist and writer; 18 December in Mumbai. (See obituary on p. 35).

BEREAVED

Sulochana Saralaya, Sruti Correspondent in Bangalore, by the death of her husband P.M. Saralaya, 4 November 2005 in Bangalore. Carnatic vocalists Saralaya Sisters-- Kavitha & Triveni (Sruti Representative in Bangalore), are their daughters.

 

Click to read more

utsAha
Festival featuring talented young artistes