Home

About Us

Current Issue

July Issue

Niroshtha, Tyagaraja and Muruga, Nostalgic about NGS and many more
... Subscribe Today

copyrightsruti.com

Designed, Developed & Maintained By
Swathi Soft Solutions

   
  
Section Synopsis (December 2005)

NEWS & NOTES

A VIEW FROM THE TOP OF SUBBUDU'S LIFE AND WORK -LEELA VENKATARAMAN

On August 17th at the IIC Annexe, a book release function organised under the auspices of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan and Appan (Asia-Pacific Performing Arts Network), unlike many other similar occasions, took on a specially nostalgic aura. The book in question Beyond Destiny by Lada Gurudev Singh is on the life and work of the Pitamaha of dance and music criticism, namely Subbudu. Critics, as I mentioned in my talk, write but seldom get written about. And this occasion was celebrating the youngest entrant into the field of dance-writing looking critically at the life and work of the oldest and most haloed of critics. If the courage of youth in stepping into an area where angels would fear to tread evoked admiration, not less praiseworthy was the large heartedness of a haloed senior like Subbudu submitting his life and work to the scrutiny of one  so young. Turned out in a beautifully starched dhoti and angavastram, a frail looking Subbudu arrived in a wheelchair surrounded by a concerned and loving family.

Speaking on the occasion, Lada Guruden Singh emotionally dwelt on the "long journey" with Subbudu this work had entailed. Since Subbudu's vast writings in Tamil were beyond his reach, Lada's dependence had to be on Subbudu's own recall of past events, aside from his English writings which would of course have been a major source of material. He had spoken at length to other critics and dancers and musicians. But floating amidst the sea of scattered material gathered, Lada had more than once felt that he was inadequate for this job. Rushing to his aid to rescue him out from acute bouts of despondency had been his mother whose steadfast single-handed support had been his source of strength throughout life's lotus-eating years. Being constantly with Subbudu in the last few months, he had discovered how a man who lived and breathed music and dance, often at the cost of sacrificing his domestic obligations as husband and father, had had the great good fortune of having by his side the support of a loving and capable wife who had accepted Subbudu's hours away from home with equanimity as the inevitable occupational hazard of being wedded to an exceptionally gifted human being. Subbudu had on occasions gone to a concert with one of his children and returned home alone having forgotten in the after-performance excitement about the young one accompanying him! Being privileged to learn at the feet of such a veteran, he had also been able to glimpse the soft man who lurked behind the hard critic. Writing this book had meant having to "live Subbudu" not just listen to him. Lada quoted a senior critic's remark about Subbudu that here was one who had neither praised the King nor earned any favours for his own self.

Critic colleague and commentator Shanta Serbjeet Singh said, "The intelligent reader learns from a critic not what to think about a piece of art but how to think about it." Unlike films on dance, which do not always give an accurate picture, the only reliable means of judging music or dance offerings is through an objective critic's writings. Subbudu's work cannot be understood or appreciated or evaluated independently of the historical, social, political and artistic context within which the dancer/choreographer is working. Experimentation in dance has not received his support and he has had his bugbears. But using criticism to function as both teacher and judge, he has brought to bear on his writings his vast experience as a musician and as a critic.

"You can understand how the sight of a ramrod straight figure, sitting quietly in a corner, eyes  half closed, tapping tala on his fingertips with the speed of a machinegun in action, often turned even experienced dancers into a mass of jelly...." Watching over the years the `legendary clash' between the rise of post-modern experimental India and classical traditional dance, "he  (Subbudu) has not often played the mediator and apologist for either or both traditions". This  critic also observed that Subbudu has lived through some of the most epoch making years in the country's political, social and artistic life. The young Subbudu's enormous histrionic talents, his superb musical prowess and the ability to wield a vituperative pen to boot, soon caught the eye of Kalki Krishnamurthy. The rest was history, for much was happening-- the fall of the devadasi, the rise of Rukmini Devi and Kalakshetra, Balasaraswati and the famous sringara / bhakti tensions with her on one side and Rukmini Devi on the other, the sabha culture which took over the arts scene, the move to Delhi to see the birth of institutions like the Kathak Kendra, the setting up of the Akademis, AIR and its music promotion, the birth of Television et al-- Subbudu's pen had much to write on and write he did - with a venom which delighted and a wit which made had no qualms about poking fun at the person of the artist. Even though classical dance and music are the much-hyped roads to a higher consciousness, there is something about the performance situation, which creates inflated egos amongst artists. And Subbudu believed that pricking that ego balloon was his job as a critic. The fuming dancer rarely dared to confront the critic for that would have meant paring a jati or teermanam down to its micro-elements and reassembling it to demonstrate the arithmetic, questioned by Subbudu. Or it could mean engaging in a discussion on the intricacies of a raga with a man who could play the harmonium in a way that could charm the birds off the trees. One of Subbudu's greatest contributions through his Tamil writings in Dinamani Kadir, Ananda Vikatan and Kalki lay in the way he used the Tamil language and his racy writing style with witticisms and analogies from daily life which brought home the intricacies of classical music and dance to ordinary readers. By increasing the readership he also enlarged the circle of music and dance audiences. Also he was a critic who had no gender bias at all and all the great women stalwarts in music from M.S. Subbulakshmi, Pattammal to Vasanthakumari, and more recently the Sudha Ragunathans and Bombay Jayashris owe a great deal of their success to Subbudu's praises. In a still predominantly patriarchal society, this was some achievement.

This man who had survived the rigours of the harrowing trek from Burma (Myanmar) to India in the early years had faced all the ups and downs of life with indomitable courage. Lada had, however, been able to catch Subbudu at his most vulnerable period, just after the death of his wife and companion of sixty odd years. His shock absorber who had shielded him from life's vicissitudes had gone, and that stiff upper lip and unshakeable spirit had crumbled.

C.R. Garekhan, formerly Permanent Representative of India at the UN and now Vice President of Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, released the book Beyond Destiny with the first copy being handed over to the Secretary Culture of the Government of India, Nina Ranjan. Office bearers of the Bhavan lauding Lada's efforts said that while the youngster had been recommended as a talented writer  to the Bhavan authorities, they had had to see the first proofs of the writing before being reassured about their choice.

Subbudu, in the briefest of replies, thanked the Bhavan and all those concerned for the book and the evening function. It was plain to all that he had stood the strain of the evening with great effort.

Prof. Omchery N.N. Pillai, Principal, College of Journalism and Communication, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan delivered the vote of thanks and the evening ended with many admirers handing floral tributes and offerings to Subbudu.


 
MAIN FEATURE

The Bhavani Duo  B.V.  Raman  &  B.V.  Lakshmanan

The following was written in 1999, soon after the passing away of B.V. Lakshmanan, by S.V. SESHADRI, music critic and longtime contributor to Sruti, more famous under the nom de plume, AEOLUS. It was inadvertently overlooked at that time. It is now being published as a tribute to the memory of Lakshmanan, and as an uttama rasika's analysis of the music of the twins. Some excerpts :

They did not hail from a place rich in fertility of land or mind like Tanjavur; they were not cradled in a lineage, hoary with traditions of music running through many generations; and, until they began studying music as a regular discipline, they had not even imagined that they would enter a vocation as beckoning and as bewildering as music. In a more literal way and in a far truer sense than in the case of many others, it can be said that they did not choose music as their goal in life; it is music which chose them as its votaries. And they did not belie its choice

The B.V. Brothers, Raman and Lakshmanan, belonged to a Brahmin family from Bhavani near Erode, which might have seen better days, but not certainly very affluent at the time the brothers were born as twins in February 1921, at Gooty in the present Andhra Pradesh. Their father, B.V. Subrahmania Iyer, was stationed at Gooty as Deputy Collector, at the time of their birth....

In 1938, when Subrahmania Iyer died, the twins had completed their matriculation, and for a  future career had chosen subjects far removed from music. Raman was learning accountancy by tuition and Lakshmanan was doing the BIET correspondence course in radio-engineering. Their father's death resulted in the winding up of the establishment at Perundurai and shifting to Bangalore where Ramamurthi was employed as a clerk in a stationary store. It was at Bangalore that the twins, at the age of seventeen, and more,  entered into a formal study of music under S. Srinivasa Rao....

It so happened that Tiger had a chance to hear the B.V. Brothers sing, and was so charmed by  it, that he suggested that they should join the Sangeeta Bhooshanam course in the Music College at Annamalai University in Chidambaram, of which he was the Principal. Tiger offered to keep the brothers in his own house and offered scholarships for the study.... The twins joined the college at Annamalai University in 1939 and passed out in 1943, when Varadachariar himself relinquished the principalship to join Kalakshetra at Madras. (See Sruti 105/106, p. 34)....

While imbibing the best of music at the College, the twins were privileged to serve Tiger Varadachariar in gurukulavasam and learn from his incomparable singing whenever he got into  the mood....

After passing with credit in the Sangeeta Bhooshanam course, the brothers came to Madras.... They continued to attend on Varadachariar at Kalakshetra. In 1945, Lakshmanan went to New Delhi accepting the post of a tutor in the Karnataka Sangeeta Sabha there, while Raman remained in Madras. Since the brothers were total strangers to the music field and had no patrons either by way of social or family connections, they had to confine their activity mainly to teaching music to students privately....

In 1957, when Lakshmanan returned to Madras, it was with the intention of embarking on a  career of concert singing. Probably the brothers were the only pair who thought of entering the concert platform well after their 35th year and made a success of it against the established and entrenched singers of the day....

The brothers opted for strength and stability in their music rather than fluidity and flair. Their disposition to frills and flights of fancy was severely curtailed by a sense of propriety. The strongest resource in their store was the kriti. Their music was essentially centripetal, drawing attention to the centrality of the kriti....

In the elaboration of the raga-s there was a marked divergence in their approach. Raman was partial to broad sweeps of the brush and laid the colour thick and strong.... Lakshmanan, on the other hand, was Praxitelean in the way he caressed the swara sequences and in the looped interlacing of the sanchara-s....

Their concern for laya vinyasa being minimal and unobtruding, the swara singing became more a formality than an adventure.

The brothers had built up a vast repertoire of kriti-s of various composers....

As much as their music, it was the personal qualities of the brothers that endeared them to the public as well as to their peers in the field.... Their dealings with their accompanists or with the organisers were absolutely straight and fair.... Their generosity in appreciating the music of their contemporaries or even juniors did not harbour any reservations....

They found  strength in the value of music which they pursued with loyalty to tradition and with confidence in the image of the tradition which they cherished in their hearts....

With the blessings of the late pontiffs of the Kamakoti and the Sringeri Math-s, they have been instrumental in bringing to public attention the existence of the saint Sadasiva Brahmendra's Brindavan in Manamadurai and in organising annual observance of the aradhana at Manamadurai.


Adherent To  Sampradaya

The following has been written by V. KARPAGALAKSHMI on the basis of her interviews with B.V. Raman, the surviving twin of the B.V. Raman - B.V. Lakshmanan duo. B.V. Raman has been selected for the title of Sangeeta Kala Acharya by the Music Academy  this year. Excerpts:

Raman relates two interesting incidents during their concert tours:

l The brothers were performing at Nellore Krishna Mandir during Gokulashtami. Dwaram Satyanarayana and Madurai T. Srinivasan were the accompanists on the violin and mridanga respectively. Ahiri raga was developed in a pensive mood and Narayana Teertha's tarangam Veekshegam katha was rendered. Srinivasan remarked on the stage that they might not get any food as they had sung Ahiri. After the concert they retired to the adjoining quarters. As the Bhattachariar was bringing the prasadam of lemon rice and curd rice in bowls, a beggar (yenadhi) snatched them and ran away. After a hot chase the Bhattachariar was able to catch him but he could bring back only empty bowls, as the yenadhi had emptied the rice in his towel and thrown the bowls away. The Bhattachariar had to prepare food afresh for the musicians!

l The other incident is about a musician, Bugga Papiah Sastrigal, who was a great devotee of Tyagaraja and had, by his efforts, persuaded the Government to change the name of Innespet to Tyagaraja Nagar. He was conducting the Tyagaraja utsavam at Rajahmundry. His residence was very close to the venue where the utsavam was being held. In their concert, Raman and Lakshmanan chose Madhyamavati as the main raga and sang Adigi sukhamu. While they were singing the niraval for the charanam 'Neeke daya putti brotuvo brovavo', they noticed sparks in the pandal above their heads and the lights went off. Sastrigaru who was near the stage rushed to his house to bring a lantern. After a few minutes he came back overwhelmed, weeping and uttering "Ramudu brotunne unnadu" (Rama keeps on saving us). In the meantime electricity had been restored. He explained to the audience that, when he opened the door of his house, he was shocked to find that a rat had just then toppled the oil lamp on the pooja shelf and the fire was slowly spreading and consuming the vastra kept nearby. He felt that it was Lord Rama's timely intervention that made it necessary for him to go to his house, as otherwise he would have lost everything....

lComposers and teachers

lThematic concerts

lTiger and Vasudevachar

lSome anecdotes

lOn teaching and learning

"A number of young boys and girls sing well today; but parents pressurise them into performing on the concert platform too soon without allowing for natural evolution. Youngsters are also forced to take part in various programmes/competitions in Carnatic as well as cinema music on the TV. This is not a good trend; spending so much time on film music is regrettable; it affects the time spent on learning/practising classical music."

"One should not commercialise sangeetam-- musicians should not demand money but accept whatever is paid. We never demanded or argued about money or compared our payments with that of other artists. By God's grace we had no problem with payment. Similarly, we never solicited chances for performing. Things are different today. One can't blame the younger generation for demanding rates or forming associations."


<<back

Books & Instructional Media by Jayalakshmi Eshwar